Okay. I certainly appreciate and accept the fact that you are sharing with us what you feel would be the challenges of implementing the appeal division. As I said, I'm not dismissing them.
You will also perhaps agree with me that these decisions made by IRB are significant and will have significant ramifications upon the people who are seeking a decision by IRB. Any significant alteration of the decision process will sometimes have life-and-death ramifications upon the lives of those people. And not only do we have to be fair, but we have to be seen to be implementing a fair and transparent process.
This committee has heard from various witnesses about the challenges and the obstacles an applicant would have to face if he or she is denied, based on what they feel was an unfair decision, and if the court review process or the PRA process did not afford a transparent or open appeal mechanism.
Let me get back to this question. Would you, then, favour reinstating two judges on the IRB panel instead of implementing the appeal division?