First of all, the recommendation in the report was that the merging of those two bodies be considered; we did not recommend that it take place immediately. The reason, as you can see, is that the roles of those two different boards deal with different competencies.
That said, we had a third-party review of the process. There were two different groups of people coming to grips with two complex sets of information, namely the backgrounds for the candidates; it was generally felt that there could well be efficiencies in merging those two. Our recommendation was that it be considered. How that has unfolded in the last three months I'm not in a position to tell, because I do not know, but the aim was to promote efficiency.