I would question whether the amendment is in order. The main motion is to proceed immediately to consideration of clause-by-clause. This amendment clearly would delay that, and I think it runs counter to the intention of the original motion.
Mr. Chair, I would also submit that we have already dealt with that issue here at the committee. We have had essentially the same motion. We disposed of it by disagreeing with it. So we have already dealt with that issue; therefore, I would also submit that it's out of order on that basis as well.