There has been some criticism, stemming from the Harrison report, that people who failed the test that was administered as part of their survey were recommended by the advisory panel. I think that's been used in some quarters as a way of discrediting the work of the advisory panel. I'm just wondering if folks have a response to the concern the Harrison report made about recommending someone for appointment who had failed that aspect of the screening process.
On April 19th, 2007. See this statement in context.