I understand your question. Couldn't one equally argue, though, that it's conceivable that we could end up, down the road, with a chair of the IRB who ends up making appointments that are very politicized? I'm not suggesting that has been the case, but I'm saying that is certainly conceivable. Just as there may be a fear that a minister could politicize the process, we could end up with a chair who would be very political and appoint not just golfing buddies but donors to certain political parties.
Is that not a legitimate fear?