It would be impossible to argue that acts should not be in compliance with the charter. I would find it impossible to argue that, at any rate. As I said at the beginning, my impression is you're working your way towards a solution.
As a citizen, I've always looked at cabinets and thought there were certain jobs that needed a long time in occupancy. I would say the three that probably require the longest time in occupancy are finance, foreign affairs, and citizenship and immigration—and heritage, perhaps—because they're just so complicated that to get an idea of how they really work and to get on top of the files is very difficult, very complicated.
You're right, we have a history that is, by international standards, pretty good, but by our standards it has some really serious flaws in it. After all, I have a Chinese wife who isn't part of that original Chinese diaspora. So I know those cases where we failed very well, as all of you do—where we failed with Jews, where we failed with Ukrainians, where we failed with Japanese—and we learned a lot.
You're right, I think the charter is to a great extent a reflection of that, and I guess we have to now find our way through this baggage that we still have. I suppose there always will be baggage, but each time it comes along we have to find our way through it as fast as possible.