I understand, of course, it's the public safety minister who's responsible for the issues there. I understand he is appearing before the public safety committee next week, and certainly questions could be put to him there if that's what needs to happen.
We have obviously visited this issue on a number of occasions and we have various matters on our agenda. I think that with the minister already appearing before another committee in short order, and we won't get him before this committee sooner than that, if Mr. Siksay wishes to put the question to him, he should then use one of his members on that committee to put the very question he wants to bring before this group. Certainly we won't get it done any quicker, and I think our agenda would remain intact.
So I would say that this motion be opposed, but that Mr. Siksay be entitled to pursue the matter at the minister's appearance in the other committee. It really is a matter of public safety jurisdiction.