The fact of the matter is, this particular committee heard evidence quite a long while ago and is in the process of completing a report based on hearing that evidence, which will be concluded, I understand, on Tuesday of next week, and this committee will be making a report to the House, as a whole, dealing with issues specifically raised in this motion.
This motion was done for one reason and one reason only--to play some political games and for some political points, when in fact the report will be forthcoming on Tuesday of next week. I think it is inappropriate to have a report going to the House without the specific evidence being referred to, when we have a report in the making that will be presented to the House very close to Tuesday of next week. I don't see why we would do two reports, a pre-pre-report and a report. The committee has extensively discussed this issue in the main and is in the process of almost completion. I think it is inappropriate for this motion to go forward, because it has no reasonable basis for it to proceed when we know a report is forthcoming as early as next week.