Chair, I just want to be clear. I agree with Mr. Wilson that this should be a report on the work of the committee that the committee takes ownership of, something that's passed and approved by the committee. I agree with him that we should remove that reference to the vote of seven to four, and the phrase “the opposition members of the committee” in the third paragraph. Also, I would oppose adding that the government members opposed, or whatever.
I think it should be generic about what action the committee has taken. That's in standing with my understanding, at least, of what happens when committees pass a motion, that the committee takes ownership of that, and further actions are taken in respect of the entire committee, not of any particular individual member or group on the committee.