I wanted to ask one quick question about the question of revocation of citizenship, because it's something the committee did a lot of work on in the last Parliament and made, I believe, a unanimous report on that matter.
I'm very concerned about the evidentiary standard that needed to be upheld in that process, given the seriousness of revoking someone's citizenship and taking that kind of measure against them. I wonder if the minister believes there's a problem with the war crimes legislation that exists in Canada that would merit going to a lesser or subsidiary process of revocation of citizenship to deal with serious issues of war crimes or suspected war criminals. Why are we not dealing with a war criminal under war crimes legislation or Criminal Code legislation? Why are we moving to what I would call a lesser citizenship revocation process and dealing with folks in that manner? Doesn't this serious crime merit serious attention through a direct approach of the war crimes legislation?