Revocation is a very serious issue. It doesn't happen very often at all, but there are circumstances very clearly laid out where it's appropriate. This has been done in accordance with the law that has been in existence since the 1980s. I believe it was in the 1980s that the policy was brought in. It has been consistent. It has been before the courts. The courts have upheld it. In fact, the Federal Court is very much part of the process in determining whether there is sufficient evidence of an individual's complicity in that process.
I would point out also that the final decision does lie within the Governor in Council. That process is a very onerous one, actually, and everything was conducted, all of the exercise, in accordance with the law as it exists now. I think the fact that there were cases where the Governor in Council declined revocation speaks to the fairness of the system.