That's been tabled in the House already. I think there needs to be some amendment to that, so that it's clear who that dissenting opinion is from. I don't think it serves the committee well to have that stand when it's not indicated who it's from.
The other concern I had, Chair, is this. I want to raise my concern about the difficulty this committee has had in arranging representatives from the department to appear before it on several issues, on the issue of a briefing on Bill C-57 and a briefing on temporary foreign workers and undocumented workers. My understanding is that the clerk has been trying to arrange this for almost a month, I believe. I don't think it's out of line to say it's been that long.
Even today the clerk was asked to try to arrange it for today's meeting, and it still hasn't happened. I don't understand why that would be. It seems to me that if the government is interested in seeing Bill C-57 move ahead, they might have ensured that representatives of the department were prepared to give us that briefing. And I also don't understand why the government wouldn't be prepared to have officials brief us about temporary foreign workers and undocumented workers.