Evidence of meeting #64 for Citizenship and Immigration in the 39th Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was chair.

A recording is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Clerk of the Committee  Mr. Samy Agha

11:45 a.m.

Liberal

Jim Karygiannis Liberal Scarborough—Agincourt, ON

What I'm saying, Chair, is by the end of October if we need to go back to hear more people in Toronto, certainly this can stand as it is right now, and if we see that we need more, then we do cover that. I would suggest that we leave it, and at the end of October we can—

11:45 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Norman Doyle

Okay, that's fine. That seems to make sense to me, given what we've already talked about here with respect to extra time in Toronto.

Mr. Siksay, you had a comment.

11:45 a.m.

NDP

Bill Siksay NDP Burnaby—Douglas, BC

Chair, at the planning committee we also looked at that long list of possible witnesses on the Iraqi refugee question. One of the concerns of the planning committee was that we wanted to hear about policy, not individual experiences of problems and individual casework kinds of suggestions. So I hope all members of the standing committee can be clear about that, that rather than hearing from—

11:45 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Norman Doyle

Yes, we want to hear about policy in that regard, not to bring in your individual cases—

11:45 a.m.

NDP

Bill Siksay NDP Burnaby—Douglas, BC

Policy and organization are what we want to give priority to.

11:45 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Norman Doyle

Okay, that is a suggestion.

11:45 a.m.

Liberal

Jim Karygiannis Liberal Scarborough—Agincourt, ON

Chair, for a lot of the people who will be coming to us and talking about this policy, there is some concern about the treatment they're getting at the posts when they apply. We might want to consider either inviting or hearing them over the phone, as we did with the situation from London, England. We can invite the heads of the posts to phone in, at a convenient time for them, to give us testimony on what they're seeing on the ground, and probably some folks from the UNHCR on this issue.

11:50 a.m.

NDP

Bill Siksay NDP Burnaby—Douglas, BC

That's what the second part of the recommendation was meant to deal with, Chair, so maybe we should delete the travel to Toronto part of the recommendation on the back of the page and leave in “Invite organizational—”

11:50 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Norman Doyle

Okay. “Invite organizational representatives to appear before the Committee in Ottawa.” I think that's fine. People would go along with that.

All right? Okay.

11:50 a.m.

Liberal

Jim Karygiannis Liberal Scarborough—Agincourt, ON

Is the recommendation that we leave it in or delete it?

11:50 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Norman Doyle

It is to delete the first part of it and leave the second part of it there.

11:50 a.m.

Liberal

Jim Karygiannis Liberal Scarborough—Agincourt, ON

Chair, I would recommend that we leave it until the end of October, and if we need to delete it, then we would delete it at that point in time. Let's see how it goes.

11:50 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Norman Doyle

Andrew.

11:50 a.m.

Liberal

Andrew Telegdi Liberal Kitchener—Waterloo, ON

Have you ever done something where we have a lot of people who want to come, say, on this particular issue, where we could get them to meet and do a round table among themselves before they come to the committee, and then they could give us representative samples as well as policy suggestions?

11:50 a.m.

Liberal

Jim Karygiannis Liberal Scarborough—Agincourt, ON

Okay, but you have an amendment on the table that says we leave this until after our meetings in October.

11:50 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Norman Doyle

The suggestion from Mr. Siksay was that the first part of this recommendation, to travel to Toronto, Ontario, on Monday, November 19, 2007, be deleted, and that we leave the part about inviting the organizational representatives to appear before the committee. I guess that's because of the extra time we're spending in Toronto talking about these issues.

Can I hear from those who would be in favour of deleting that first part, the travel to Toronto?

11:50 a.m.

Liberal

Jim Karygiannis Liberal Scarborough—Agincourt, ON

Mr. Chair, before you do that, I had a recommendation on the table that we leave this alone until after we—

11:50 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Norman Doyle

Yes, but I had Bill's first.

11:50 a.m.

Liberal

Jim Karygiannis Liberal Scarborough—Agincourt, ON

No, no. You had mine first.

11:50 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Norman Doyle

Did I have yours first? No, I don't think so.

11:50 a.m.

Liberal

Jim Karygiannis Liberal Scarborough—Agincourt, ON

I suggested that we leave it alone until we finish in October and then we—

11:50 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Norman Doyle

Well, okay. We can do both, Jim.

11:50 a.m.

NDP

Bill Siksay NDP Burnaby—Douglas, BC

You don't need a motion to leave it alone, Jim. The only motion on the table is to delete something that's already there.

11:50 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Norman Doyle

Okay.

First of all, let's go to Bill's motion here.

11:50 a.m.

Liberal

Jim Karygiannis Liberal Scarborough—Agincourt, ON

Do we have input on that before we vote?