But just going along those lines, on anyone they find, they end up issuing a removal order. So there's a whole subset of people--as I said, 200,000 to 500,000. I don't know if it's so much the question of the ones for whom they have a removal order, but just the magnitude of the problem, and is it realistic to try to address it the way it's now being addressed?
The other issue regarding that is that maybe we could have a differentiation between the kind of people we have here, such as undocumented workers, and then the 2,000 or 3,000 people where you have a serious problem of criminality. It would seem that a focus on finding and removing those folks should really be a priority, because that's pretty malignant, whereas the other one is pretty benign--as a matter of fact, helpful, I would say.