It looks as if that issue might need some continuing work, especially when you talk about risk-based planning, although to you folks that might mean something different from what we're talking about right now.
I want to follow up on the question about the immigration levels. Did you examine how the department sets those targets and what information it is based on? There has often been some question about where those targets spring from and how commitments like the previous government's commitment to 1% of population as an immigration target are established. Generally, where did the annual targets that were announced in the past come from?
I also have a question about the 60-40 split in applications. Of the applicants accepted each year, 60% are from the economic class and 40% are from the family and refugee class. Why is it 60-40? Is there a point that would establish a better equilibrium between economic and family class applicants, a better balance, so as not to have the huge backlog in family applications? Is that something you folks looked at when you were considering targets?