I think Madam Faille alluded to places where there are agreements in place with provinces. The specific case that I'd raise is the settlement agreement with British Columbia. There's some concern that not all of the money transferred to the province goes into settlement services, that some of it--almost half--goes into general revenue and is then used for other things that are outside of the scope of the agreement. The province will say it's for things like fee-for-service language training, which isn't part of the agreement.
Was that part of what the studies looked at in 2000 or 2003?