Just to say this. We've been around this bend for a long time. Many stakeholders are saying that the bill as it is is a bill they're prepared to accept, and they want us to get it through both Houses as soon as possible without amendment.
Mr. Karygiannis had all kinds of objections or things he wanted to see different in the bill, but we came through with a unanimous report and we're at this place where we have to decide: do we want this bill to go forward and be passed and become law for the many thousands who are affected, or do we want to play games and make amendments that will change this legislation, which will not have that effect? It won't, and we'll see where it goes. If you're prepared to risk and deal with the thousands or hundreds because you want to see something in this bill that can be dealt with outside the bill, then do it at your own peril, if you wish.
My sense is that this bill, if it's going to succeed, will have to succeed without any substantive amendments. There may be clerical stuff or whatever—fine. But to start dealing with, “If I can't get this amendment, I want that amendment”.... We're past that stage. If we do that, and we can, don't expect it to get through the House in the fashion we're talking about.