On a point of order, Mr. Chair, I've always said that we should receive evidence before we make a report to the House. So today was a good step in that direction, because we actually heard from someone before making a report. But to take this to its logical conclusion, there were some specific things requested by Mr. Telegdi from the department—and I'm not sure, but perhaps from Mr. Karygiannis as well. In any event, that information is not before us yet. If you're going to do a report, that information should be before us, and we should put together a report that encapsulates some of the evidence with a recommendation in the end, and not just a motion.
So I would say the motion should be the result of a report, and the report should be the result of the evidence. We've heard the evidence, but we have not yet made a report. Neither do we have all of the evidence, because some of it has to come back in due course. When it comes back, then we should deal with the report—if we're going to have a report to the House.
That would be my preliminary point of objection to our voting on the motion, having gone this far.