I think that's a valid question, and presumably that is the purpose for which you are studying this.
I guess what I can say is that within the scope of the existing act and the existing regulations, there was flexibility to be able to act for this category of individuals in a relatively quick fashion to correct or address a perceived imbalance or inequity in treatment. So we used the existing flexibilities in a way that gave us the flexibility to be able to treat these people on an equal footing.