Let me just comment on the question of the automaticity, because it has come up a couple of times now.
The reason, in these cases in which we have put a time window on cases where people are out of status as opposed to just providing an automatic stay in Canada until a decision is made, gets at the heart of the question Mr. Khan was posing about the risk or the incidence of fraudulent relationships entered into seemingly for the purpose of getting here in the first instance.
I think the view is that the lack of an automaticity is a signal that you're subject to removal, but we're going to defer the removal—as opposed to staying the removal—for a period of time to allow ourselves to determine the authenticity of a relationship. I think the concern is that a move to pursue an automatic free stay in Canada until we decide sends a signal.
We can have a debate about whether it's a substantive or significant signal that significantly affects behaviour or not; that's a question of policy debate. But the perspective of having the possibility of removal there in some sense sends a signal that there is no free pass, as it were.