I guess what I'm saying, sir, is that I recognize that, and with respect to direct reference to the objective of the motion, the provisions that we have under the act, under the regulations, and the flexibilities we've put into place were designed to be able to get us to a position to make a determination in virtually all cases that we can get to. Will it cover exactly 100% of all cases? Can we offer that guarantee here today? No, because there are going to be specific circumstances around some cases that mean there is going to be an objective or a reason to move on removal, and you referred to a couple of them in your comments.
What are those factors that lead us to not being able to make a determination in 60 days? We look at that--on what basis are we having difficulty reaching a final decision?--and we determine whether or not to proceed with the removal. I'm sure there are many cases where we've hit that 60 days where we've determined that it is not expeditious or efficient or effective to move forward on a removal, and we will wait to provide the time for our final decision.
So most of the conversation, I think, is really focused around a very small percentage of cases where, for some reason, there was a compelling reason, and the specifics of the case will have to dictate what that looks like, I think, when we've decided to move forward.