I don't know that that's a conclusion that one necessarily comes to. It's going to come down to what Member Telegdi said: how good are they going to be at getting out the message on which processing cases they will handle and which they won't?
Does it increase the risk of what you're talking about? I think it does potentially. Again, it comes down to this. If you're the end-user of the immigration system, at this point there is some ability, however limited it is, unfortunately, to go yourself to their website, look things up, and decide if you can be selected. Every immigration decision--it doesn't matter what category--is divided into two decisions: selection and admission. Have you been chosen in your particular category, and are you otherwise admissible?
Right now we have a system that at least enables the first thing to be relatively easily done without my assistance necessarily, or that of an immigration consultant, and hopefully without that of an unlicensed immigration practitioner. The problem is that what they're talking about in that bill changes this. It makes it very difficult for that to happen. That goes back to my theme of how is this making the system more accessible to the end-user, to the actual immigrant? I think it can't be helping that perspective.