The second question is about the experience class, which is being debated right now. It is only 20,000, only those who have skills, who have degrees, who speak English or French. So out of 120,000, perhaps only 20,000 of them would qualify. The rest of the 100,000 would have no chance of becoming permanent residents.
You suggested you want to give them a sense of hope, so that they can upgrade, so that they can bring their families over, so that they can establish bonds in Canada. Is it fair to punish those who have lower skill sets? We need their labour, but because their skills are not the degree types of skills, we do not allow them to apply, or even if they apply, they do not have enough points and therefore they cannot become landed immigrants and therefore they would not be able to bring their families to Canada. I don't see that as being fair.
How do you think we should restructure the experienced class so that they have a fair chance, just like the live-in caregiver? If you go to school, you apply, and likely you're going to qualify. Should the experience class mirror the experience we have had with the live-in caregiver program?