Yes, I think it is correct that consultants should be regulated. I agree with that. There is a need for discipline. I support that.
The concern I have is the fact that CSIC is not enforcing this thing. So far, there have probably been only one or two hearings since their creation.
In terms of standards, yes. We all went through that. We all had to write the professional exam. We all had to write the English exam. So I agree with the need for standards.
But in terms of enforcement, we are not seeing much in that area, and that's why it's easier for ghost consultants or phantom consultants to do their own thing.
Rather than putting money into discipline and full regulation, to me the board has just paid itself a huge amount of money that could be diverted to that area.