Yes. First of all, there needs to be some correction in the system. It has to be debated.
Just to give you a quick example, picking up on the point about overseas agencies, the Supreme Court of Canada maintained two provisions under the act, section 117 and paragraph (9)(d), and certain exclusionary provisions as constitutional because of the opportunity to have a section 25 relief. If you start playing with one part of the act, it's like a house of cards: other parts are going to fall, and we will find ourselves in a worse backlog than we have now.