No, we are advocating that these workers should continue to pay into a program that provides them the full benefit of what is entitled to them. We argue that the non-residency requirement is discriminatory against sending country workers, and also that these premiums could be prorated in regard to seasonal agricultural workers. But they are entitled to sick benefits and parental benefits; therefore, we have withdrawn our legal challenge, because the number of parental benefits has skyrocketed through our offices because of our work.
On April 8th, 2008. See this statement in context.