Following Mr. Komarnicki's speech, I would like to continue with the people from the Law Society of Upper Canada. I'm trying to transpose what is done by the Ordre des ingénieurs du Québec, to which I belong. To regularize what's being done in practice, there are two parallel paths. There's obviously the internal discipline of the members of the association, with the syndic, who can intervene and impose penalties on those who do not conduct themselves properly. There is also the ability to prosecute and intervene with people who are not members and who practise the profession illegally.
If I understand what you're telling me, there is a regulatory framework, making it possible to discipline members who freely choose help. It's in its inability to discipline and intervene with non-members that there is a deficiency. Have I correctly understood?