Those same individuals claim that they introduced four motions at that general meeting, supported by 70 or 100 signatures. Those motions requested that members once again be granted the right to request a special meeting, to adopt a transparency policy, to establish a finance committee consisting of members in order to control cost overruns and to review the compensation of directors and to limit that compensation to $30,000. Those individuals claim that those four motions were rejected without even being placed on the agenda and debated. Is that correct?
On April 9th, 2008. See this statement in context.