I'll start.
First of all, the unscrupulous consultants will exist no matter what you do, because there have been just too many of them for such a long time, and by the time you go through the system and get it down to a manageable level, a long, long time will have elapsed. This is why I go back to saying that there's more accountability if each province takes care of this matter. The government has to set up something national to take care of the immigration consultants who are outside of the provinces' jurisdictions, and there has to be a whole new regulatory binding for people who are practising outside. I know lawyers practise outside the country, but lawyers are held to the higher standard and immigration consultants are not. So you're not really comparing the same thing.
So we're all talking the same language. We all agree that it's not working now, and we all agree that changes have to be made, so I'm saying that provinces should do their own thing. The provincial nominee program could serve as a model. The appeal mechanism is the law society of the province, and these people have to do their job. If these people do their job, this is going to discourage phantom—that's the word that is used at CSIC—immigration consultants—