The reason I asked that question is that we are hoping that this bill will not pass by the second week of June, which is the summer break. That would give us time in the summer to come to organizations such as yours to invite your workers and their clients, together with Mr. Szeto and others, to actually have a balanced discussion. Because right now, the minister has really just presented one side. The minister has financial means of over $1 million to put out ads--and I've seen full-page ads in the Chinese paper--that talk about the backlog. This bill, if passed, if implemented, has nothing to do with the 925,000 people who are in the backlog. And if people are already there in the 925,000 backlog, an administrator could find out who they are without having to change the bill, without changing IRPA.
Let me then ask you about the point system. You talked about the need to review the point system, and I totally agree with that. Do you think it would make sense for us to put in more points, first, if there are family members, such as brothers, sisters, uncles, and aunts in Canada? Second, is the ability to speak fluent English or French or both really...? I've noticed that we have a lot of temporary workers coming in who are chefs. I looked at the list of all the temporary foreign workers who are coming in across the country--to B.C., Alberta, Manitoba, and so on--and the majority of them are chefs. Is it critically important that we have a large number of chefs who can speak either fluent French or English?