As far as charter protection and public transparency in policy goes, we have no concern. Our concern lies in the execution of those instructions. That's why we have to put in a point system. It's not the policy or the instruction itself. But anytime you give discretionary power to the civil servants, we have to have a way to monitor how those discretionary powers are used. That's why in our submission we say that there needs to be clear, transparent, and accurate reporting of when and how these powers are used. If these powers are incorrectly used, then the political masters can make sure it doesn't happen again.
The point system is put in for that purpose. It's not quite working. We heard from Madam Chow that maybe we should change it a bit to include the people who have relatives here, to give them more points. People with relatives here, by and large, have a better chance of integrating economically, socially, and culturally. So perhaps that's the way to proceed.