I'm happy to see it doesn't come off my time. That's a good decision.
There is obviously a concern by many that our system is not flexible and does not respond to the economic needs of the country, and with the current legislation the backlog has grown to be what appears to be, by anyone's estimation, almost unmanageable, 900,000-plus and growing. Proceeding through Bill C-50 by way of instruction as opposed to amendments to the act or regulations, in your opinion—either of you here—how is what's happening in Bill C-50 allowing the system to be more responsive? And would it be more responsive than the other methods or not? Would you care to comment on that?