I would be tempted to deal with the motion at the very end of the meeting. We have two motions before us. One motion was introduced by Mr. Karygiannis and the other by Ms. Chow. The two motions are substantially different. I don't know what the intention of the committee is. Do we want to merge the two motions into one, debate them right away and then hear the witnesses? Do we want to deal with the two motions at the end, one after the other? I don't understand exactly. We have our schedule, we have witnesses to hear and there is a desire to vote on the motion before hearing the witnesses.
On December 6th, 2007. See this statement in context.