No, I was just checking if there was any interest in that. I do not want to make an amendment if no one else is with me. I was not trying to say that 48 hours comes at the beginning or the end of the committee meeting, but that 48 hours is the same as two days. I point out to the committee that, since we will be here from 9 a.m. to 11 a.m. on Tuesdays, we would have to submit a motion before the Tuesday meeting if we want to get it passed at Thursday's meeting. In practical terms, that is three days. Because of our schedule, if we pass the 48 hours rule, this committee is giving itself no possibility of being able to react on Thursday to anything that could happen after our Tuesday meeting. But if we say 36 hours, we could submit a motion for the next meeting immediately after the previous one. We cannot do that as the motion presently stands. If you see what I am driving at, let us change the time to 36 hours. If I am the only one who sees it like that, there is no need to vote.
On February 3rd, 2009. See this statement in context.