Given that it takes six to twelve months to get a new member to be fully productive and that in your calculation that's $100,000 per person, that's phenomenal. Of the 89 that were recommended, 52 were turned down. These members obviously qualified. They had been IRB board members. If more of them were to come back in, surely a lot of money would be saved, since each new member would cost $100,000 to get fully productive. Have you calculated the lost opportunity? I guess I could just multiply it; you don't really need to do a report on that.
But have you done an exit survey? For example, would you have the power to interview the 52 who were not reappointed and examine why they weren't reappointed and how much money was lost as a result?