We note in the report that we are satisfied with the process that is in place. We believe it is a rigorous one. The candidates that are being proposed should be qualified and apt to play the role of the board member. As I mentioned earlier, a certain turnover is to be expected. People shouldn't stay on these boards for years and years. I think, as for many positions, there should be a rotation, but it needs to be managed. When we see that more than half are in their first term and now I would imagine an even more significant portion of the people will be less experienced, that needs to be managed, going forward. What is an appropriate turnover rate?
On April 28th, 2009. See this statement in context.