That's correct according to the information I have, and again, I wasn't at the board in the period of time that was covered by the Auditor General's report. However, my understanding is that during the period covered by the Auditor General's report, which was January 1, 2006, to March 31, 2008, 89 members were recommended for reappointment and 37 of them, or 42%, were actually reappointed.
On April 28th, 2009. See this statement in context.