Do you examine the past of candidates and the effect that this past could have on the board's credibility? I do not want to talk about specific cases, because I know that you will not be able to answer. If a person is suspected of a war crime, for example, a human rights crime, or if the person has been convicted of contempt of court, is that considered? Do you ask yourselves if that person, having become a member, could be in a situation of having to administer laws that he himself may have broken, thereby putting the board's credibility at risk?
On April 28th, 2009. See this statement in context.