Since this case is still before the courts, I can understand that you cannot comment. We were talking about her case, because she appeared before the committee last week.
But what I still don't get is how you allow for the exceptions, exceptions that sometimes are really not anyone's fault, especially not that of the child who is born in a situation that may make his or her citizenship doubtful. How do you cover that in the current law? I don't see care taken in those situations: the child who was born, as she was, abroad, but who came to Canada and lived in Canada most of her life until she became an adult. How do you cover this in the current law?