I'm not quite sure how else to answer the question, other than to say, put all the facts before us that the individual submits. They make their case, they lay out the facts of their case, they provide to us in writing an explanation of why they feel their case warrants exceptional consideration, why they feel they would undergo or endure an undue hardship if they followed the normal immigration process, and why they feel they have a particularly strong attachment to Canada, if you will.
Because it is a discretionary provision in the act to capture those cases that don't fit neatly within the parameters of the law, there are not strict guidelines per se beyond just an assessment of hardship. I can't give you a list of eight things we go through and check in those circumstances.