Back to the visitor visas, whether it's from Mexico or Cuba, we are still seeing in Havana, for example, a 69% approval rate, which means one out of three are being turned down. I come back to the whole notion that because it is so opaque, people have no idea. Each time they apply, they put in $75, which is non-refundable. As a result, people wonder, is it the dollar amount they make back home or is it a good job? I've seen people who have good jobs, and I have seen people who have families, and I've seen people who have real estate or own several companies, yet they're still being turned down for a visitor visa.
So if you put visa requirements on Mexico, for example, you have to have a very clear and transparent process. If not, people will ask whether it's just to make money, because every time they apply, they end up paying $75. In England and Australia, their appeal process is free—which is why they're getting a lot of visitors. So why would you not put in an appeal process so that at least the decisions are made on law and fact and are not, seemingly, subjective decisions?