Forgive me for having to speak in English. I understand French but it is difficult for me to speak it.
I just want to respond to one thing. It's this whole idea of numerous appeals and things like that. This goes back to the whole idea that a failed refugee has a lot of options open to him.
It's true that we have the PRA. The reality is that the PRA is not an efficient review mechanism. The acceptance rate is, I think, about 2% or 3%. There are huge amounts of resources being expended on a process that really doesn't achieve any useful purpose at the end. That's why I repeat: you can divert those resources to the RAD and eliminate the PRA and you would have a fairer process, in my opinion.
In terms of the H and C, this is something that goes back to.... It's funny, but I had totally forgotten about this report and now Mr. Bevilacqua has reminded me. I think there is this idea that you can make 20 and 30 H and C applications, and it's true that legally you can. That's perhaps something the government might want to look at, because the reality is that for the vast majority of people, once you've made one H and C, you have your answer. Unless you really didn't present your full case, it's not likely that another officer looking at the same set of facts is going to make a different decision later. I think there are things that could be done to curtail these types of endless H and C applications.