Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
So what I hear, Mr. Boulakia and Mr. Waldman, is that to have an effective, consistent refugee determination process, we need to get rid of the unscrupulous consultants, put in an appeal division, eliminate PRA and the stay at the Federal Court, and give the refugee officer the power to say yes to obvious cases through a chair directive or guidelines without legislative change, without changing IRPA and without taking it through Parliament.
Those are five clear areas, and of course there is a sixth, which is to have officers that are fully trained and permanent: if you add the resources, you can clear the backlog and stop the flow of bogus refugee claims; you would save money in the Federal Court and you would certainly eliminate the backlog.
Is this what I'm hearing, or have I missed one of the elements?