Do you agree that for the refugee board all appointments should be done according to merit and according to clear guiding principles, instead of partisan considerations, and that they shouldn't be through an order in council? They should not be appointed by the minister's office, because clearly the audit said that if 33 out of 54 appointments were not made based on merit, or failed the guiding values, then there is something wrong that one board member would decide on the fate of the family, like the one you are talking about. That board member would have life and death—in this case, death—on his hands.
So it's critically important that there is an appeal process.