I will continue with Mr. Rico.
I appreciate that you agree that there should be a possibility of appeal. The lawyers who appeared at our last meeting pointed out that there were a number of ways to improve the system without making legislative amendments. Furthermore, everyone agrees that it needs to work well. But it seems to me that adding the appeal recourse is a fundamental point.
Mr. Rico, I want to delve a bit further. The bill before us today aims to bring into force legislation that already exists. When the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act was enacted, we went from two board members to one. The addition of an appeals division for refugees was supposed to balance that out.
Do you think that the first part of the amendment should be passed, that is, going from two board members to one, without passing the second part, namely, adding an appeals division?