But I will bring your attention again to the 40% rate of appeal acceptance at the ADR. I believe this demonstrates that the decisions the visa officers are making are not correct at least 40% of the time. In terms of the feeling that there is fraud in certain cases and discrepancy between certain officers, I feel that this is really a demonstration that there's a problem there.
Why is it that there is a feeling that there is over 50% fraud from the Hong Kong office versus 3% from the Taipei office? It doesn't make sense. Why is that discrepancy there?