Thank you, Mr. Chair.
I'm wondering, with this motion now, and especially the motion that we completely stop all deportations, how it is that we will then address individuals who may have committed unbearable atrocities back home? How do I go back to my Tamil community and say to them that it doesn't matter what you may have done back home, Canada is going to protect either side in this conflict?
We don't know when there will be a safe environment. This is a conflict that has been going on for 60 years. Are we going to allow another 60 years' worth of zero deportations to that area? Are we going to drop any pretence that we are going to look at individuals who may be in this country who are actually responsible for acts of terrorism? Are we going to overlook anybody who has committed an atrocity back home? How are we going to address people who are in the conflict zone? How are we going to get them to Colombo so that we can actually bring them back to Canada? These are the issues.
I understand what the member opposite is trying to do in this, but I think the motion itself lacks the comprehensive nature that we as a committee need to truly understand what is happening in the conflict zone and how we can actually make a proper impact. It would be very easy to say, “Just have a moratorium. Forget about it.” I certainly am not looking forward to going back into my community and telling people who have come to me in my riding office and suggested that there are individuals who are living in this country now who shouldn't be here, whom they are frightened of, who need to go back to their homeland.... I now have to go back and tell them that a committee of Parliament has decided that it doesn't matter what happened, they're going to be staying here.
I think we really need to take a look at this motion. We need to take a look at what it is we want to accomplish with this motion, and we have to do a lot more work than what we can do in the context of 10 minutes in front of a committee with a motion that has been amended a number of times already, Mr. Chair.
Again, I think it's something we should take off the table for now and research properly to see if we can't come back with something that would be more appropriate and that would truly help the people we're trying to protect here.