I am trying to understand why, in general, you think the minister should have the right to appeal certain decisions, but you are withdrawing that right in cases of people who would come from designated safe countries of origin. Would it not be more relevant, on the contrary, because, as you claim, people who come from those countries are less likely to be actual refugees? Why are you removing the power to appeal a favourable decision?
On May 4th, 2010. See this statement in context.