My question is for the people from the bar association. In the discussion on possible measures to limit or restrict the scope of the concept of designated countries, it was proposed that the act set out the most objective possible criteria for designating a country.
Based on your experience, can you tell us whether having such criteria in the act could result in a court's overturning the decision of the executive? Are these absolute criteria the minister would have to comply with, or would the minister ultimately determine the criteria and would there not really be any chance of appeal even though they were included in the act?