It is said that people will make representation to the immigration officer, and this will not be in writing, this will be taped. Now, my concern here is that if you're giving something taped, sometimes you might say the wrong thing. It's not professionally transcribed, so a lawyer might have to read hundreds and hundreds of pages of transcript for the 60 days. Shouldn't a PIF do? For my colleagues here, a PIF is a personal information form. Shouldn't that be sufficient versus a taped interview?
On May 13th, 2010. See this statement in context.